Reconstructing the Role of Al-‘Adah Muhakkamah in Islamic Criminal Law: An Integrative Framework of Naṣṣ, Living Law, and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah

Authors

  • Bahatma Baca Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Taufiq Nasution Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Mulkan Nasution Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Fauzan Mas’ar Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66174/416r0808

Abstract

The increasing complexity of contemporary society has generated new forms of criminal conduct that cannot always be addressed adequately through the classical formulation of Islamic criminal law. This condition requires a methodological framework capable of preserving the normative authority of the Qur'an and Sunnah while accommodating dynamic social realities. Although the legal maxim al-'adah muhakkamah (custom is recognized as a legal consideration) has long been acknowledged as one of the fundamental principles of Islamic legal maxims (qawā'id fiqhiyyah), limited scholarly attention has been devoted to reconstructing its function as an integrative instrument connecting nash, living law, and maqāid al-syarī'ah in contemporary Islamic criminal law. This study aims to reconstruct the function of al-'adah muhakkamah as a methodological framework for harmonizing normative Islamic legal authority with evolving social realities. This research employs normative legal research using conceptual, statutory, and philosophical approaches through qualitative library research based on classical juristic works, uūl al-fiqh, qawā'id fiqhiyyah, legislation, and recent scholarly publications. The findings demonstrate that al-'adah muhakkamah should no longer be viewed merely as a supplementary legal maxim but as an epistemological bridge integrating scriptural authority, the objectives of Islamic law (maqāid al-syarī'ah), and living law. Such reconstruction enables Islamic criminal law, particularly within the sphere of jarīmah ta'zīr, to respond adaptively to contemporary crimes while maintaining immutable Islamic legal principles (tsawābit). This study proposes an integrative model positioning al-'adah muhakkamah as the methodological nexus between universal Islamic legal norms and contemporary social realities, thereby strengthening the adaptability and sustainability of Islamic criminal law in modern society.

References

Abdul Karim Zaidan. Al-Wajiz Fi Ushul al-Fiqh. Mu’assasah al-Risalah, 2015.

Ahmad al-Raysuni. Imam Al-Shatibi’s Theory of the Higher Objectives and Intents of Islamic Law. International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2005.

Al-Mawardi. Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyyah. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1989.

Apipuddin, Apipuddin, Ulyan Nasri, R. Arif Mulyohadi, and Asbullah Muslim. “Integrating Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) and Islamic Criminal Law: Addressing Malware-Based Data Theft.” Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 9, no. 2 (2024): 154–70. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v9i2.10269.

As-Syatibi. Al-Muwafaqat Fi Usul al-Shariah. Vol. I. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1997.

Brian Z. Tamanaha. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford University Press, 2001.

Eugen Ehrlich. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Harvard University Press, 1936.

Hutchinson, Terry, and Nigel Duncan. “Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research.” Deakin Law Review 17, no. 1 (2012): 83–119. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70.

Ibn Qudāmah. Al-Mughnī. Vol. 10. Dar ’Alam al-Kutub, 1997.

Ibn Rushd. Bidāyat Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihāyat al-Muqtaṣid. Vol. 2. Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 2004.

Ibnu al-Qayyim al-Jauziyyah. I’lām al-Muwaqqi’īn ‘an Rabb al-‘Alamīn. Juz. I. Dār Al-Kutub al-“Ilmiyyah, 1993.

Jalal al-Din ’Abd al-Rahman ibn Abi Bakr al-Suyuti. Al-Ashbah Wa al-Naza’ir Fi Qawa’id Wa Furu’ Fiqh al-Shafi’iyyah. Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1983.

Jasser Auda. Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008.

John Braithwaite. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press, 2002.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. “Sharīah And Civil Law: Towards A Methodology Of Harmonization.” Islamic Law and Society 14, no. 3 (2007): 391–420. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851907782792508.

Lawrence M. Friedman. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation, 1974.

Mohammad Hashim Kamali. Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law. Oxford University Press, 2019.

Mohammad Hashim Kamali. Shari’ah Law: An Introduction. Oneworld, 2008.

Mustafa Ahmad al-Zarqa. Al-Madkhal al-Fiqhī al-’Ām: Ikhrāj Jadīd Bi-Taṭwīr Fī al-Tartīb Wa al-Tabwīb Wa al-Ziyādāt,. Vol. 2. Dār al-Qalam, 1998.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Cet. 4. Kencana, 2008.

Satjipto Rahardjo. Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Genta Publishing, 2009.

Tim Lindsey. Indonesia: Law and Society. 2nd ed. The Federation Press, 2008.

Wael B. Hallaq. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Wael B. Hallaq. Sharī’a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Wahbah al-Zuhaili. Al-Fiqh al-Islami Wa Adillatuhu, Vol. 1 (. I. Dar al-Fikr, 1985.

Wahbah Zuhaili. Ushul Al-Fiqh al-Islami. II. Dār al-Fikr, 1986.

Yusuf Qardhawi. Fiqh Al-Zakat. Vol. 1. Dar al-Muassasah, n.d.

Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islamiy Wa Adillatuhu. Vol. 7. Dar al-Fikr, 1996.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-25

Issue

Section

Articles