Legal Capacity of Individuals with Bipolar Disorder in Islamic Marriage Law: Integrating Ahliyyah al-Adā’ and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah

Authors

  • Syifa Arinda Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Dinda Seplinar Batubara Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Keisyah Yuvi Amanda Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Abdul Latif Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • M. Rifky Abdillah Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Icha Azdina Adly Universite Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Morocco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66174/zx2hdm76

Abstract

Marriage in Islamic law is founded upon the principles of legal capacity (ahliyyah), mutual consent, and the realization of maqāid al-sharī‘ah through the protection of religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property. Nevertheless, the increasing prevalence of bipolar disorder has generated complex legal and ethical questions regarding the legal capacity of affected individuals to enter into marriage and to perform the reciprocal rights and obligations arising from the marital contract. Existing scholarship has predominantly examined bipolar disorder from isolated perspectives, including marriage validity, child custody, or disability rights, without providing an integrated legal framework that reconciles classical Islamic jurisprudence, contemporary mental health knowledge, and Islamic family law. This study aims to reconstruct the concept of legal capacity for individuals with bipolar disorder in Islamic marriage law by integrating the doctrine of ahliyyah al-adā’ with the objectives of maqāid al-sharī‘ah. Employing normative juridical research, the study combines statutory, conceptual, comparative, and Islamic jurisprudential approaches. Primary legal materials consist of the Qur'an, Sunnah, classical fiqh literature, Indonesian marriage legislation, the Compilation of Islamic Law, and selected judicial decisions, while secondary materials include recent peer-reviewed international journals on Islamic family law, disability studies, and psychiatric research. The study demonstrates that bipolar disorder should not constitute an automatic legal impediment to marriage. Rather, legal capacity must be determined through an individualized assessment of cognitive competence, decisional autonomy, psychological stability at the time of the marriage contract, and the ability to fulfil marital obligations. The article proposes a reconstructed framework in which ahliyyah al-adā’ is interpreted dynamically through the lens of maqāid al-sharī‘ah, emphasizing transparency regarding mental health conditions, protection of both spouses, and proportional legal safeguards instead of categorical exclusion. This reconstruction contributes to contemporary Islamic family law by harmonizing classical jurisprudential doctrines with modern psychiatric knowledge and human rights principles while strengthening substantive justice in Muslim family law.

References

Abū Bakr al-Kāsānī. Badā’iʿ al-Ṣanā’iʿ Fī Tartīb al-Syarā’iʿ. Vol. 2. Dār al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1986.

Aḥmad, al-Dardīr. Al-Sharḥ al-Kabīr. Vol. 2. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1998.

An-Nawawī, Abu Zakariya. Rawḍah Al-Ṭālibīn. Vol. 7. Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2003.

Association, American Psychiatric. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed., Text Revision. American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2022.

As-Syatibi, Abū Isḥāq. Al-Muwafaqat Fi Usul al-Shariah. Vol. 2. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1997.

Berk, Michael, Seetal Dodd, and Lesley Berk. “The Management of Bipolar Disorder in Primary Care: A Review of Existing and Emerging Therapies.” Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 59, no. 3 (2005): 229–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2005.01365.x.

Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl al-. Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. n.d.

Duffy, Anne. “The Early Natural History of Bipolar Disorder: What We Have Learned from Longitudinal High-Risk Research.” The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 55, no. 8 (2010): 477–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371005500802.

General Comment – Equal Recognition before the Law. No. 1 (2014): Article 12. UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2014.

Ghaly, Mohammed. Islam and Disability: Perspectives in Theology and Jurisprudence. Routledge, 2010.

Goes, Fernando S. “Diagnosis and Management of Bipolar Disorders.” Clinical Review. BMJ 381 (April 2023): e073591. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-073591.

Grisso, Thomas, and Paul S. Appelbaum. Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals. Oxford University Press, 1998.

Ibn Qudāmah. Al-Mughnī. Vol. 6. Dar ’Alam al-Kutub, 1997.

Jasser Auda. Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008.

Kay Redfield Jamison. An Unquiet Mind: A Memoir of Moods and Madness. Vintage Books, 1995.

Keramatian, Kamyar, Nellai K. Chithra, and Lakshmi N. Yatham. “The CANMAT and ISBD Guidelines for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: Summary and a 2023 Update of Evidence.” Focus: Journal of Life Long Learning in Psychiatry 21, no. 4 (2023): 344–53. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20230009.

Koenig, Harold G. Religion and Mental Health: Research and Clinical Applications. Academic Press, 2018.

Minkowitz, Tina. “The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Right to Be Free from Nonconsensual Psychiatric Interventions.” SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 1481512. Social Science Research Network, April 21, 2007. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1481512.

Mohammad Hashim Kamali. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Vol. 3. Islamic Texts Society, 2003.

Mustafa Ahmad al-Zarqa. Al-Madkhal al-Fiqhī al-’Ām: Ikhrāj Jadīd Bi-Taṭwīr Fī al-Tartīb Wa al-Tabwīb Wa al-Ziyādāt,. Vol. 2. Dār al-Qalam, 1998.

Nierenberg, Andrew A., Bruno Agustini, Ole Köhler-Forsberg, et al. “Diagnosis and Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Review.” JAMA 330, no. 14 (2023): 1370. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.18588.

Nierenberg, Andrew A., Bruno Agustini, Ole Köhler-Forsberg, et al. “Diagnosis and Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Review.” JAMA 330, no. 14 (2023): 1370–80. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.18588.

Padela, Aasim I. “Islamic Medical Ethics: A Primer.” Bioethics 21, no. 3 (2007): 169–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00540.x.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Cet. 4. Kencana, 2008.

Quinn, Gerard, and Anna Arstein-Kerslake. Restoring the “Human” in “Human Rights”: Personhood and Doctrinal Innovation in the UN Disability Convention," Dalam The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Vieta, Eduard, Michael Berk, Thomas G. Schulze, et al. “Bipolar Disorders.” Nature Reviews. Disease Primers 4 (March 2018): 18008. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2018.8.

Villiana, Charly Octa, Mohammad Yasir Fauzi, and Agus Hermanto. “Child Custody Due to Wife’s Mental Disorder: A Maqashid Shariah Perspective Analysis.” Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, September 30, 2025, 757–75. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.61091.

Wael B. Hallaq. Sharī’a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Wahbah Zuhaili. Al-Fiqh al-Islami Wa Adillatuhu. Vol. 4. Gema Insani, 2011.

World Health Organization. Mental Health Atlas 2023. World Health Organization, 2024.

Zuhdi, Syaifuddin, Lutfi Robiatul Adawiyah, Marisa Kurnianingsih, M. Junaidi, and Abdul Hakim. “Bipolar Disorder and Child Custody in Indonesian Religious Courts: Operationalizing Sadd al-Dharī‘ah to Balance Child Welfare and Parental Rights.” Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 11, no. 1 (2026): 149–76. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v11i1.13136.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-23

Issue

Section

Articles